Governance Framework
The Community Evolution of MemeMarket
MemeMarket is built to evolve beyond its initial architecture into a decentralized governance model, empowering token holders with decision-making authority to ensure long-term alignment and protocol resilience. Over time, voting power will progressively reflect each userโs activity and contribution to the network.
Governors will play a key role in making decisions about:
Fund allocation
Resource management
Introduction of new features
Prediction market governance
Evolving MemeMarket with the Community
Stage 1: Fully Centralized
In the initial phase, the core team holds full control over the protocol. This ensures rapid development, quick issue resolution, and the ability to respond to critical problems immediately.
A centralized approach is essential in the early stages to efficiently handle core development tasks, bug fixes, and urgent improvements that cannot be effectively addressed through a community voting process.
Stage 2: Hybrid Governance
As the project matures, governance will move to a hybrid model, combining centralized and decentralized elements. While the core team will still handle technical updates, investment strategy and urgent fixes, strategic decisions will involve input from the community through token-based voting.
This phase balances the need for efficient development with the benefits of community involvement. By incorporating feedback and insights from stakeholders, the project can begin planning for long-term success while maintaining agility.
Governance Lifecycle: From Proposal to Execution
Proposal โ Vote โ Timelock โ Execution
The governance framework follows a clear and transparent lifecycle:
Proposal Creation: Community members submit proposals covering protocol upgrades, market expansions, treasury allocations, and more.
Voting Period: Proposals enter a voting phase where $MFUN stakers weigh in based on their staked token holdings.
Timelock Period: Approved proposals enter a mandatory timelock window, providing time for community review and preparation before implementation.
Execution: Post-timelock, validated proposals are executed on-chain, ensuring transparency and immutability.
This structured flow maintains community trust, safeguards against rushed changes, and promotes deliberate protocol evolution.
Governance Power: Progression-Based Influence with Multi-Dimensional Weighting
MemeMarket governance is engineered as a progression-weighted system, where voting power is derived from a composite of user contributions across multiple protocol vectors; not limited to static token staking alone.
The Levels-Tiered Progression System integrates staking weight, liquidity provisioning depth, predictive market participation, and cumulative platform activity into a unified governance score. This composite metric ensures that users who actively enhance protocol health; by driving liquidity velocity, increasing market depth, and participating in core trading flows; command proportional influence over ecosystem decisions.
Voting power dynamically escalates as users ascend progression tiers, compounding their influence in governance proposals that shape market listings, treasury deployment, reward calibrations, and future protocol extensions.
This multi-dimensional approach mitigates governance capture by passive holders and redistributes authority to active capital allocators and protocol participants. As MemeMarket matures, this architecture ensures that governance outcomes remain tightly coupled to protocol success metrics; embedding alignment between decision-making, capital productivity, and ecosystem expansion.
AI-Powered Governance Participation
As MemeMarket continues to evolve and deliver new features and ecosystem benefits, the AI Meme Agent will also play a key role in enhancing governance accessibility:
Proposal Discovery: Surfacing relevant active proposals tailored to each userโs interests and Level of progression.
Voting Reminders: Timely prompts ensure users participate in governance windows.
Data-Driven Insights: Summarized analysis of proposals, social sentiment, and likely impacts; helping voters make informed decisions.
This integrated AI layer turns passive governance into active, informed participation.
Last updated
Was this helpful?